contentpile.com contentpile.com contentpile.com
Home About Us Privacy Terms of Use Add Url Add Your Article
Search:   
 
 

Hurricane Season, War in Iran, and Diesel Prices - What is Next? Lance Rants

Some people do not quite understand the issues with our economy and high fuel prices, which are a fi ... - Lance Winslow
 

Pray Persistently (for the Right Reasons)

You pray day and night in full faith. Still, God doesn't seem to hear you. You are still jobless, yo ... - Babes Tan-Magkalas
 

It's Official: Inflation is Back! (And it may be worse than you think)

A look into 2006. - Luigi Frascati
 

George Soros

No. 8 GEORGE SOROSAt least $60 million - Mark Crisp
 

Vampires: The Romantic Ideology Behind Them

The purpose of this article is to analyze the ideological components that sustain the notion of the ... - Xavier Zambrano
 

Take Comfort

Are national and global events happening a little faster than you would like? Are you growing uneasy ... - Ed Howes
 
 

Home › News & Events › Political News
 

Congress Has Trampled on the Constitution

 
Author: Terry Mitchell
 

A few weeks ago, The Senate passed a bill which increases indecency fines on TV broadcasters to a maximum of $325,000 per violation. Subsequently, it was sent to President Bush and he signed it into law.

However, it is destined to be struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court. It doesn't take a legal scholar to see that this new law obviously violates the Constitution's ban on excessive fines. Just think about it - a person who is convicted of running a red light, an act which puts people in danger of serious injury or death, is rarely fined more than $500. However, someone or some entity convicted of uttering one swear word on TV is now going to be fined $325,000? Where's the justice in that? Are we saying that a certain amount of red light-running, along with its resulting injuries and deaths, is to be tolerated while we enforce a zero-tolerance policy on TV indecency, which has never injured or killed a single person? Are morals more important than lives? Apparently, some people think so.

What's makes the proposed TV indecency sanctions look even more ridiculous is the fact that the maximum fine in most states for felony assault does not exceed $100,000. Is Congress trying to tell us that uttering a profanity during prime time is more than three times as bad as committing felony assault?

Of course, one might argue that the real reason for the high fines is because the lower fines could never get the broadcasters' attention and they have resulted in the networks continuing to broadcast indecent material during prohibited hours. Okay, but why don't we apply this same logic to red light-running? The current fines have not stopped people from doing this. Hundreds of people run red lights every single day. Why not impose fines of up to $325,000 every time someone runs a red light? Better yet, why not impose the death penalty? Now, that would stop people from running red lights. So, why don't we do it? Because it would be excessive and would violate the Constitution. The same would be true of the proposed new indecency fines.

 
 
 

Related Articles

 
Thousand names of God - The secrets of Vishnu Sahasranama
 
Evil Spirits Will Return
 
Elijah's Dose of Reality
 
Search Engine Optimization for RSS Feeds
 
God Has Never Broken Any Promise Ever Spoken!
 
Pray Persistently (for the Right Reasons)
 
Christian Unity according to Internet
 
Socialist Public Schools In America
 
Beryl Cook's Unique Art
 
George Soros
 
 
 
Add Your Link
 

Academics & Education

Family & Home

Teens & Kids

Property & Agents

Internet & Computers

Recreation

Finance & Investment

Jobs & Employment

Tour & Travel

Fashion & Relationships

Drink & Food

Culture & Art

News & Events

Vehicles & Automotive

Business & Companies

Shopping Online

Society & Issues

Medicine & Treatment

Fitness & Health

Science & Research

Self Management

Adventure & Sports

Government & Politics

Online & Indoor Games

 
Home -> Privacy -> Terms of Use  
Copyright © 2008 www.contentpile.com